LOOKPORT / comparison
Lookport vs DICE
A source-led Lookport and DICE comparison for live events, focusing on commercial terms, ticket allocation and event-data questions.
Which approach fits your event?
DICE works with event partners under ticketing agreements and exposes partner event data through its API. Compare that partnership model with Lookport’s branded ticketing offer and direct Stripe payment setup.
Ask the same questions of both platforms
For a tour, request a demonstration of multiple dates, city-level reporting, allocations and settlements. For VIP, confirm package fulfilment as well as ticket types. Compare your own sales mix and required workflows, rather than assuming one platform wins every category.
What this comparison can and cannot tell you
These are selected documented facts, not a complete product audit. Fees and availability can vary by market, plan and agreement. A question left open is not a claim that a feature is absent. Lookport is the publisher of this comparison.
Compare the details
Official sources checked: . Confirm current terms for your market.
| Topic | Lookport | DICE |
|---|---|---|
| Fees | 6% platform commission; Stripe processing is separate. | Check the applicable commercial agreement. This comparison does not assign DICE an invented universal rate. Official source |
| Payment flow | Payments through the organiser’s connected Stripe account. | Confirm collection, deductions and settlement terms in the applicable partner agreement. Official source |
| Event data | Event and sales insights support organiser decisions. Confirm export requirements separately. | Documents a partner Ticket Holders API for querying event-related entities. Official source |
| Event setup | General admission, allocated seats and different ticket types are described in the product scope. | Ask DICE to demonstrate the required seating, VIP and multi-date workflows; the cited API alone does not establish them. Official source |