LOOKPORT / comparison
Lookport vs Ticket Tailor
Compare Lookport and Ticket Tailor: percentage versus ticket-credit fees, payment processors, reserved seating and event workflow.
Which approach fits your event?
Ticket Tailor may suit organisers looking for a ticket-credit or flat-fee model and a choice of payment processors. Lookport’s published model uses a 6% commission with a connected Stripe account.
Ask the same questions of both platforms
For a tour, request a demonstration of multiple dates, city-level reporting, allocations and settlements. For VIP, confirm package fulfilment as well as ticket types. Compare your own sales mix and required workflows, rather than assuming one platform wins every category.
What this comparison can and cannot tell you
These are selected documented facts, not a complete product audit. Fees and availability can vary by market, plan and agreement. A question left open is not a claim that a feature is absent. Lookport is the publisher of this comparison.
Compare the details
Official sources checked: . Confirm current terms for your market.
| Topic | Lookport | Ticket Tailor |
|---|---|---|
| Fees | 6% platform commission; Stripe processing is separate. | Offers prepaid credits and pay-as-you-go ticket fees. Seating can use additional credits; processor fees are separate. Official source |
| Payment flow | Payments through the organiser’s connected Stripe account. | Lists Stripe, PayPal and Square as payment partners. Official source |
| Reserved seating | Allocated seats and general admission are described in the Lookport product scope. | Supports seating charts, with the charge described on its pricing page. Official source |
| Operations | Confirm the door, refund and team-access workflows needed for your event. | Lists a check-in app, ticket groups and team permissions. Official source |